Serena Williams isn’t holding back. After years of dealing with baseless doping accusations, the previous world primary has lashed out on the Worldwide Tennis Integrity Company (ITIA) for its lenient dealing with of Polish star Iga Swiatek’s failed doping check.
The controversy erupted when Swiatek obtained solely a one-month suspension for testing constructive for trimetazidine, which the ITIA attributed to a contaminated meals complement. Many, together with Williams, had been left questioning the equity of the ruling.
Williams calls out double requirements
Throughout an impassioned Instagram Dwell session, Williams mirrored on her personal profession, saying, “It is funny-my complete profession was constructed round hatred. I obtained so used to it, I really snicker now.” She famous that it wasn’t followers however fairly the media perpetuating unfounded suspicions about her integrity.
“The press would say terrible things-‘Serena cheats,’ ‘Serena makes use of stuff others aren’t utilizing.’ But, right here we’re, and folks caught red-handed get nothing,” Williams added, alluding to Swiatek’s case.
A historical past of harsher penalties
The leniency of Swiatek’s suspension has reignited discussions about equity in doping rulings. Media has pointed to the contrasting remedy of different gamers, like Maria Sharapova, who obtained a 15-month ban in 2016 regardless of proving her constructive check was because of a prescription medicine.
Equally, Simona Halep confronted a four-year ban for testing constructive and spent months combating to show it stemmed from a contaminated complement. Regardless of lowering her ban to 9 months, Halep had already misplaced a good portion of her profession.
Serena leads the cost
With Serena Williams and different critics like Halep talking out, the ITIA is below immense scrutiny. The disparity in punishments has fueled requires reform and a more in-depth have a look at how anti-doping insurance policies are enforced.
Swiatek’s case might have quickly closed, however the debate surrounding it’s removed from over, particularly with Williams making certain the problem stays within the highlight.
window.addEventListener('ue-dfp-loaded', (s) => { let urls = [
url: 'https://tags.tiqcdn.com/utag/unidadeditorial/marca/prod/utag.sync.js' ,
url: 'https://tags.tiqcdn.com/utag/unidadeditorial/marca/prod/utag.js' ,
url: '//e00-elmundo.uecdn.es/js/uecomscore_cmp_event.js' ,
url: 'https://cdn.permutive.com/10453011-272d-49cd-9043-1964fdb36fd8-web.js' ,
url: 'https://e00-marca.uecdn.es/assets/v31/js/ue-utils.js'
]
urls.forEach((item) => let a, b, c, d, e; a = item.url; b = document; c="script"; d = b.createElement(c); d.src = a; d.type="text/java" + c; d.async = !0; d.onload = item.callback ? item.callback : null; e = b.getElementsByTagName(c)[0]; e.parentNode.insertBefore(d, e); );
if (!document.body.hasAttribute("data-ue-special"))
var cookieList = document.cookie.split(';'); cookieList.forEach( function (item) if (typeof item == "string" && item.indexOf("REGMARCA") != -1) var ifr_seed = document.createElement("iframe"); ifr_seed.src = "https://5214106.fls.doubleclick.net/activityi;src=5214106;type=corp;cat=regis00;dc_lat=;dc_rdid=;tag_for_child_directed_treatment=;ord=" + Math.random()*1000000000000 + "?"; ifr_seed.width = "1"; ifr_seed.height = "1"; ifr_seed.style.display = "none"; ifr_seed.setAttribute("frameborder","0"); var node = document.body.getElementsByTagName("script")[0]; node.parentNode.insertBefore(ifr_seed,node);
);
(function (d, s, id)
var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];
if (d.getElementById(id)) return;
js = d.createElement(s);
js.id = id;
js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/es_ES/sdk.js#xfbml=1&version=v2.8&appId=279395918757488&status=true&cookie=true";
fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);
(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));
});
Source link
